5.+Presentation+Guidelines,+Evaluation,+and+Assessment+Forms

Explain your government. o What society did you borrow from? Why? o How many rulers are there? o Who gets to vote? How? o How do you separate powers? Why? Discuss possible strengths and weaknesses of your government. o What would happen if…? o What measures will be taken to protect the people from…? Defend your government. o How is it different from the others? o Why is your form the best? o Why do you think it will work? Include visuals in your wikispace. Smile! :)
 * Democracy Presentation Guidelines **

In the space below, honestly evaluate the work of other students in your group by answering yes or no and by using a scale from 1 to 3, 1 being poor, 2 being average, 3 being above average. Evaluator’s Name:_ __Date:___ __Group Member 1:___ 1. Did this group member complete his/her assigned tasks for the group? Yes No 2. How would you rate the quality of this person’s work? 1 2 3 3. How would you rate the timeliness of the completion of the work? 1 2 3 4. How would you rate the accuracy of the work? 1 2 3 5. Overall, how would you rank this group member’s performance in the group? 1 2 3 6. Would you want to work with this person again? Yes No Explain why in the space below.
 * Group Member Evaluation Forms**

Group Member 2:_ __1. Did this group member complete his/her assigned tasks for the group? Yes No 2. How would you rate the quality of this person’s work? 1 2 3 3. How would you rate the timeliness of the completion of the work? 1 2 3 4. How would you rate the accuracy of the work? 1 2 3 5. Overall, how would you rank this group member’s performance in the group? 1 2 3 6. Would you want to work with this person again? Yes No Explain why in the space below.

Group Member 3:___ 1. Did this group member complete his/her assigned tasks for the group? Yes No 2. How would you rate the quality of this person’s work? 1 2 3 3. How would you rate the timeliness of the completion of the work? 1 2 3 4. How would you rate the accuracy of the work? 1 2 3 5. Overall, how would you rank this group member’s performance in the group? 1 2 3 6. Would you want to work with this person again? Yes No Explain why in the space below.

Group Member 4:_ __1. Did this group member complete his/her assigned tasks for the group? Yes No 2. How would you rate the quality of this person’s work? 1 2 3 3. How would you rate the timeliness of the completion of the work? 1 2 3 4. How would you rate the accuracy of the work? 1 2 3 5. Overall, how would you rank this group member’s performance in the group? 1 2 3 6. Would you want to work with this person again? Yes No Explain why in the space below.

Group Member 5:___ 1. Did this group member complete his/her assigned tasks for the group? Yes No 2. How would you rate the quality of this person’s work? 1 2 3 3. How would you rate the timeliness of the completion of the work? 1 2 3 4. How would you rate the accuracy of the work? 1 2 3 5. Overall, how would you rank this group member’s performance in the group? 1 2 3 6. Would you want to work with this person again? Yes No Explain why in the space below.

Group Member 6:_ __1. Did this group member complete his/her assigned tasks for the group? Yes No 2. How would you rate the quality of this person’s work? 1 2 3 3. How would you rate the timeliness of the completion of the work? 1 2 3 4. How would you rate the accuracy of the work? 1 2 3 5. Overall, how would you rank this group member’s performance in the group? 1 2 3 6. Would you want to work with this person again? Yes No Explain why in the space below.

Group Member 7:___ 1. Did this group member complete his/her assigned tasks for the group? Yes No 2. How would you rate the quality of this person’s work? 1 2 3 3. How would you rate the timeliness of the completion of the work? 1 2 3 4. How would you rate the accuracy of the work? 1 2 3 5. Overall, how would you rank this group member’s performance in the group? 1 2 3 6. Would you want to work with this person again? Yes No Explain why in the space below.

Group Member 8:_ __1. Did this group member complete his/her assigned tasks for the group? Yes No 2. How would you rate the quality of this person’s work? 1 2 3 3. How would you rate the timeliness of the completion of the work? 1 2 3 4. How would you rate the accuracy of the work? 1 2 3 5. Overall, how would you rank this group member’s performance in the group? 1 2 3 6. Would you want to work with this person again? Yes No Explain why in the space below.

Group Member 9:___ 1. Did this group member complete his/her assigned tasks for the group? Yes No 2. How would you rate the quality of this person’s work? 1 2 3 3. How would you rate the timeliness of the completion of the work? 1 2 3 4. How would you rate the accuracy of the work? 1 2 3 5. Overall, how would you rank this group member’s performance in the group? 1 2 3 6. Would you want to work with this person again? Yes No Explain why in the space below.

** Group Assessment Sheets ** Category || ** 3 ** || ** 2 ** ||  ** 1 ** || Government was explained clearly and defended properly, sounded well thought out; I would want to live under it. || Government was explained clearly but was not defended, sounded interesting but not thought out; I might want to live under it. || Government was not explained clearly and was not defended, sounded generic; I wouldn’t want to live under it. || Presentation was within 12-15 minutes without long empty pauses. || Presentation was within 12-15 minutes but with long empty pauses. || Presentation was not within 12-15 minutes. || Wikispace was intriguing, colorful, easy to navigate, and very inviting. || Wikispace was average, some color, inviting, but hard to navigate. || Wikispace was boring, colorless, and uninviting. || Category || ** 3 ** || ** 2 ** ||  ** 1 ** || Government was explained clearly and defended properly, sounded well thought out; I would want to live under it. || Government was explained clearly but was not defended, sounded interesting but not thought out; I might want to live under it. || Government was not explained clearly and was not defended, sounded generic; I wouldn’t want to live under it. || Presentation was within 12-15 minutes without long empty pauses. || Presentation was within 12-15 minutes but with long empty pauses. || Presentation was not within 12-15 minutes. || Wikispace was intriguing, colorful, easy to navigate, and very inviting. || Wikispace was average, some color, inviting, but hard to navigate. || Wikispace was boring, colorless, and uninviting. || Category || ** 3 ** || ** 2 ** ||  ** 1 ** || Government was explained clearly and defended properly, sounded well thought out; I would want to live under it. || Government was explained clearly but was not defended, sounded interesting but not thought out; I might want to live under it. || Government was not explained clearly and was not defended, sounded generic; I wouldn’t want to live under it. || Presentation was within 12-15 minutes without long empty pauses. || Presentation was within 12-15 minutes but with long empty pauses. || Presentation was not within 12-15 minutes. || Wikispace was intriguing, colorful, easy to navigate, and very inviting. || Wikispace was average, some color, inviting, but hard to navigate. || Wikispace was boring, colorless, and uninviting. ||
 * Group 1: **
 * Content ** ||
 * Content ** ||
 * Length ** ||
 * Length ** ||
 * Aesthetics ** ||
 * Aesthetics ** ||
 * Group 2: **
 * Content ** ||
 * Content ** ||
 * Length ** ||
 * Length ** ||
 * Aesthetics ** ||
 * Aesthetics ** ||
 * Group 3: **
 * Content ** ||
 * Content ** ||
 * Length ** ||
 * Length ** ||
 * Aesthetics ** ||
 * Aesthetics ** ||